1. (b) How does a researcher achieve objectivity in interpretive research? (2022/P1/10/Techniques of Data collection)

Achieving objectivity in interpretive research can be challenging, as interpretive research often involves understanding and interpreting subjective meanings and perspectives. However, researchers can strive for a level of objectivity through several strategies:
Reflexivity:
Researchers should be aware of their own biases, assumptions, and preconceptions. Reflexivity involves reflecting on how one's personal background and experiences may influence the interpretation of data.
Bracketing:
Researchers can use bracketing to temporarily set aside their own beliefs and assumptions when approaching the data. This allows them to engage with the participants' perspectives without undue influence from their own preconceived notions.
Triangulation:
Triangulation involves using multiple sources of data or multiple methods to validate findings. By cross-referencing information from different perspectives or data sources, researchers can enhance the reliability and objectivity of their interpretations.
Peer Review:
Having colleagues or peers review the research process and findings can provide an external perspective. Peer feedback can help identify potential biases or oversights that the researcher may have missed.
Member Checking:
In interpretive research, involving participants in the analysis process can enhance objectivity. Researchers can share their interpretations with participants and seek their feedback to ensure that the findings align with participants' perspectives.
Transparent Methodology:
Clearly documenting the research process, including data collection methods, analysis techniques, and decision points, contributes to transparency. This transparency allows others to evaluate the research and assess the objectivity of the interpretations.
Cultural Sensitivity:
Being sensitive to the cultural context of the study is crucial in interpretive research. Researchers need to understand the cultural nuances that may influence both the participants and the researchers themselves.
Critical Examination of Findings:
Researchers should critically examine their own interpretations and consider alternative explanations for the data. This involves acknowledging uncertainties and complexities in the data and being open to multiple perspectives.
Theory Development:
Clearly articulating the theoretical framework used in interpretive research can contribute to objectivity. Researchers should be transparent about the lenses through which they are interpreting data, allowing others to understand the theoretical basis of their analysis.
While complete objectivity may be challenging to achieve, these strategies can help researchers minimize bias and enhance the rigor and credibility of their interpretive research. It's essential for researchers to continuously reflect on their own positionality and engage in ongoing efforts to approach their work with a critical and open-minded perspective.

Also Watch Video on Youtube